Free Essays on U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. Preeminent Court U. S. v. Association PAC. R. CO., 226 U.S. 61 (1912) 226 U.S. 61 US OF AMERICA, Appt., v. Association PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al. No. 446. Contended April 19, 22, and 23, 1912. Chosen December 2, 1912. [226 U.S. 61, 64] Attorney General Wickersham and Messrs. Cordenio A. Severance and Frank B. Kellogg, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for appealing party. [226 U.S. 61, 68] Messrs. P. F. Dunne and N. H. Loomis for appellees. Mr. Paul D. Cravath for appellees Jacob H. Schiff and Otto H. Kahn. Mr. James M. Beck for appellee James Stillman. Messrs. H. F. Stambaugh and D. T. Watson for appellee Henry C. Frick. [226 U.S. 61, 79] Mr. Equity Day conveyed the assessment of the court: The case was started in the United States circuit court for the area of Utah to implement the arrangements of the alleged Sherman against trust demonstration of 1890 (26 Stat. at L. 209, chap. 647, U. S. Comp Stat. 1901, p. 3200) against certain supposed tricks and blends in limitation of interstate trade. The case in its primary perspective became out of the buy by the Union Pacific Railroad Company in the period of February, 1901, of specific portions of the capital load of the Southern Pacific Company from the devisees under the desire of the late Collis P. Huntington, who had some time ago possessed the stock. Different portions of Southern Pacific stock were procured simultaneously, the holding of the Union Pacific adding up to 750,000 offers, or around 37 1/2 percent (in this way expanded to 46 percent) of the extraordinary load of the Southern Pacific Company. The stock is held for the Union Pacific Company by one of its exclusive organizations, the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company. T! he government fights that the mastery over and control of the Southern Pacific Company given to the Union Pacific Company by this acquisition of stock brings the exchange inside the conditions of the antitr... Free Essays on U.S. Preeminent Court Free Essays on U.S. Preeminent Court U.S. Preeminent Court U. S. v. Association PAC. R. CO., 226 U.S. 61 (1912) 226 U.S. 61 US OF AMERICA, Appt., v. Association PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al. No. 446. Contended April 19, 22, and 23, 1912. Chosen December 2, 1912. [226 U.S. 61, 64] Attorney General Wickersham and Messrs. Cordenio A. Severance and Frank B. Kellogg, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for appealing party. [226 U.S. 61, 68] Messrs. P. F. Dunne and N. H. Loomis for appellees. Mr. Paul D. Cravath for appellees Jacob H. Schiff and Otto H. Kahn. Mr. James M. Beck for appellee James Stillman. Messrs. H. F. Stambaugh and D. T. Watson for appellee Henry C. Frick. [226 U.S. 61, 79] Mr. Equity Day conveyed the assessment of the court: The case was started in the United States circuit court for the region of Utah to authorize the arrangements of the alleged Sherman against trust demonstration of 1890 (26 Stat. at L. 209, chap. 647, U. S. Comp Stat. 1901, p. 3200) against certain supposed tricks and mixes in limitation of interstate business. The case in its primary angle became out of the buy by the Union Pacific Railroad Company in the long stretch of February, 1901, of specific portions of the capital load of the Southern Pacific Company from the devisees under the desire of the late Collis P. Huntington, who had in the past claimed the stock. Different portions of Southern Pacific stock were procured simultaneously, the holding of the Union Pacific adding up to 750,000 offers, or around 37 1/2 percent (consequently expanded to 46 percent) of the remarkable supply of the Southern Pacific Company. The stock is held for the Union Pacific Company by one of its exclusive organizations, the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company. T! he government battles that the mastery over and control of the Southern Pacific Company given to the Union Pacific Company by this acquisition of stock brings the exchange inside the provisions of the antitr...